Let me begin with a disclaimer: I don’t hate romance. I don’t hate emotional depth. I don’t even mind a morally grey character or two. But I do have one non-negotiable: Don’t insult my intelligence under the guise of “healing fiction.”
That’s exactly what It Ends With Us did—and then the movie came in like a bad fan fiction adaptation of a Wattpad draft and made it worse. If you felt like It Ends With Us was glorified trauma packaged as a “powerful love story,” you’re not alone. Welcome to the Aureate Press corner of honest literary critique.
As a digital creator, literature student, and someone who believes stories shape minds, I feel almost duty-bound to say this out loud: It Ends With Us was a stupid book, and the movie? An even worse insult.
Let’s talk about why.
The Book That Mistook Abuse for Emotional Depth
It Ends With Us tries to market itself as a brave, emotionally raw story about breaking the cycle of abuse. I respect that mission. I do. But the execution? A disaster.
From the very beginning, It Ends With Us sells you the idea of Ryle as this deeply flawed but misunderstood man. The classic he’s hot but broken trope is played on loop until the audience is numb to red flags.
I get it—trauma is complex. But normalizing the romanticization of abuse in the name of “healing” is not the win this book thinks it is.
As someone who’s studied both literature and the psychology of storytelling, I can tell you this: when you give abusers a poetic backstory and excuse their violence with childhood trauma, you dilute accountability.
And that’s exactly what It Ends With Us does.
The Movie Adaptation? Utter Catastrophe.
If It Ends With Us the book was flawed, It Ends With Us the movie was the final nail in the coffin.
From the casting that made no sense (Blake Lively playing a 23-year-old? Please.) to the TikTok-inspired set design that looked like a Pinterest board gone rogue, it’s like the director said, “Let’s make this worse—but make it look aesthetic.”
And don’t get me started on the script. Every line in the It Ends With Us movie sounds like it was scraped from the captions of trauma-core Instagram posts.
Instead of amplifying the book’s already shaky messaging, the It Ends With Us film just doubled down on the cringe, removed the nuance, and made toxic love look… quirky.
Lily Bloom Deserved Better (And So Did the Readers)
Let’s be honest. Lily Bloom is not a complex female lead—she’s a literary scapegoat. It Ends With Us treats her pain like plot progression and her trauma like a love triangle.
We’re told to root for her, but we’re also conditioned to empathize with the man who hurts her. And that duality, when not handled with surgical precision, becomes confusing at best—and dangerous at worst.
It Ends With Us had a responsibility. It could’ve given us raw, gut-wrenching honesty. Instead, it gave us emotional confusion dressed as empowerment.
As someone who creates content around books, self-leadership, and feminine clarity, I can’t co-sign a story that leaves its audience emotionally manipulated and intellectually insulted.
The Real Problem: Trauma as Trend
You know what It Ends With Us reminds me of? The “sad girl aesthetic” that markets trauma as chic.
Look, healing is real. Emotional storytelling matters. But when your narrative structure is built entirely around triggering content without tools for resolution, it’s not healing—it’s emotional exploitation.
It Ends With Us turned cycles of abuse into viral Instagram quotes and BookTok cries, but very few readers walked away healed. Most walked away heartbroken, confused, or worse—thinking this was normal love.
And don’t even start with “It’s based on the author’s real life.” So is Girl, Interrupted. So is Educated by Tara Westover. Authentic doesn’t have to mean badly written.
From a Literature Student’s Lens: Lazy Symbolism, Rushed Plot, and Cringe Dialogue
As someone knee-deep in English Literature, let’s break down the literary weaknesses of It Ends With Us:
Lazy symbolism: The flower shop named “Lily Bloom” is so on-the-nose it feels like parody.
Over-reliance on letters: Sorry, but nobody writes love letters to a teenage boy band member and then transitions into documenting domestic violence. The tone shift? Jarring.
Flat side characters: Every character in It Ends With Us exists to serve Lily’s storyline—which could’ve worked if Lily herself had more depth.
In the end, It Ends With Us doesn’t challenge literature’s obsession with broken men. It just adds another name to the list.
Why This Matters Beyond Fiction
Why am I so fired up about It Ends With Us? Because stories matter. Books shape beliefs. Movies reinforce them. And when you present emotional abuse with aesthetic filters and dreamy montages, people internalize that as okay.
As a digital marketer and content creator, I study how narratives spread. I also study how they stick. And It Ends With Us sticks in the worst way—it glamorizes trauma and calls it love.
If even one reader walks away thinking, “Maybe he just needs healing” instead of, “Maybe I need boundaries,” then It Ends With Us has failed its audience.
What I Wish the Book Had Done Instead
More character accountability. Stop romanticizing Ryle and start showing consequences.
Less aesthetics, more reality. If it’s about breaking cycles, show the actual inner work.
Empowerment that feels earned. Lily’s final decision is rushed and doesn’t feel embodied.
Better adaptation casting. Blake Lively is phenomenal—but this role? A mismatch.
And finally: stop pretending that emotional damage equals depth. Real strength is clarity—not chaos.
Final Thoughts: It Should’ve Ended Before It Started
To everyone who loved It Ends With Us—I get it. It’s emotional. It’s intense. It made you feel something.
But feeling something doesn’t mean it was good.
As someone who reviews books and dissects storytelling for a living, I’m here to say: It Ends With Us is not revolutionary. It’s regressive. And the movie? A masterclass in misrepresentation.
Pingback: Most Overrated Books of This Decade (And I’m Not Sorry) -